For years, I thought success in exactas came from finding the four βbestβ horses on paper. Highest figures, most wins, most consistent form. But after handicapping more than 200,000 races β and training an AI to do the same β I learned thatβs not the game at all.
The secret isnβt picking the best four horses.
Itβs about finding the right four horses for that exact race, on that exact day.
In just seven racing days, our AI-enhanced selections produced eight major exacta hits across Keeneland and Belmont, including: |
π$188 Keenaland Friday 10-3
Β $127.30, $115.47, $89.18 (Belmont β last Sunday)
π₯Β $50 Exactas (Keeneland & Belmont β Saturday 10/4)
π $82 Belmont & $50 Keeneland (Sunday 10/5)
What Really Matters in Exacta Construction
When you dig deeper, the public often overbets obvious horses β the flashy Beyer figure, the high win-percentage trainer, the horse coming off a flashy win. But value hides in different places. Hereβs what I focus on (and what my AI never misses):
Class & Value: Compare purchase price vs. tag β a $200,000 horse in for $30,000 can be a major overlay.
Pace Shape (TimeformUS Early/Late): Lone speed can wire the field, or a meltdown sets up a closer. The public underweights this.
Distance Fit: A horse struggling at 6f may thrive at 7f under the right pace.
Trainer/Jockey Intent: First-off-claim, barn change, or key rider switch signal intent.
Track Bias / Conditions: Speed-favoring days or golden rails matter β and they create betting value.
Itβs not about whoβs βbestβ overall. Itβs about whoβs best today, in this race, under these exact conditions.
How This Creates Overlays
The betting public loves surface-level numbers. Theyβll hammer the horse with the biggest Beyer, even if it came in a totally different setup. Theyβll ignore the horse improving second-off-layoff with rising pace figures.
Thatβs where overlays appear.
And when you combine expert handicapping with AI precision, the publicβs mistakes become your paydays.
Proof on Sunday
Churchill Downs β Race 6
Our members hit the $115 exacta by building tickets around horses positioned perfectly for that raceβs pace shape.
Belmont Park β Race 9 (Full Breakdown)
The public hammered #4 Deemer into a false favorite:
Morning Line: 7β5 (~41% win chance)
Off Odds: 0.99β1 (~50% win chance, basically even money)
He broke 6th and finished 5th, never threatening.
We focused on the overlays:
#7 I Can See That (5β1 ML β 9β1 off): Blinkers ON, tactical 87 Early pace, went straight to the lead and never looked back.
#10 Inspeightofcharlie (12β1 ML β 8β1 off): Improving, best Late Pace 90, rallied from 7th into second.
Result: Exacta 7β10 paid $127.30.
Why This Matters Now
This fall is loaded with opportunity:
Belmont and Keeneland in full swing
The Breedersβ Cup and Gulfstream Championship Meet follow right after.
Donβt handicap like everyone else. Donβt chase false favorites. Start playing with the AI-driven Betting Advantage.
π The cost: $99 for the full year.
π The value: Every race day, every major meet, every track we cover.
π The payoff: One big exacta like Sunday covers your membership several times over.









